Ik krijg de indruk dat de lens beter is dan Photozone doet voorkomen.
De conclusie is bijna hetzelfde als die van John...
een paar punten.
- a very compact, high quality body
- The Pentax lens is actually very good to even excellent in the image center but the borders/corners suffer from massive field curvature at the wide end and plain sofness at tele settings. This is certainly no issue for portraits and such but you don't really want use this lens for architecture or landscape photography here
- The secondary characteristics (distortions, vignetting, CAs) are about class-average
- The biggest problem of the lens is its pricing which is simply not in line with the optical performance. Better consider the Pentax DA-SMC 17-70mm f/4 SDM instead which is a far better lens.
dit is wat John zei.
- If a lens for architecture and copying of documents is wanted, then this is not it. If it is wanted for general shooting of pictorial subjects and portraits then the lens produces excellent.
- in terms of handling the lens is an absolute joy to use.
- In terms of chromatic aberration, the centre of the field is very well controlled but this falls off dramatically towards the edges. It is in the area of distortion that things have been really let go, and we have quite high levels of barrel distortion that would easily be noticeable in architectural shots.
- Low fine resolution at longer focal lengths
- High price
zoek de verschillen